Archive for the ‘Blog’ Category

Portrait Contest: Results!

Sunday, August 8th, 2021

It’s time for the portrait contest results. If you’ve forgotten, the first half can be seen here. After the first five topics, Bernard was ahead 3-2!

The contest has now concluded. Let’s see how the judges voted on the remaining five…

Queen Elizabeth II

This was Lakshmi’s choice, and it was a subject I had considered selecting myself. Bernard’s is to the left, mine on the right. I went with a young Queen from 1952 and was quite proud of the texturing I got on her hair and the metallic look of the crown achieved only using a grey marker.

But… the judges apparently forgot the young Queen, and Bernard’s win of 3.5 to 1.5 (one judge gave a tie) was accompanied with some comments that only his pic looked like the Queen! Did these people forget the Queen’s coronation was almost 70 years ago?!? Lesson learned: create contemporary portraits only πŸ™‚

Ronald McDonald

The famous clown (he is a real person isn’t he?) was my next pic. This was a risky one since there’s not many variations of his look but… Bernard’s pic (on the right)well I’ll quote a judge here: “Do I really have to say which one is best?”

I won this one 5-0, which was timely since Bernard’s lead had become significant. After 7 subjects, the score was Bernard 4, me 3.

Barrack Obama

This was Bernard’s choice, and it was an obvious one I had been avoiding since I knew I didn’t have the right markers for his skin tone! He’s also a very handsome man with a strongly symmetric face, which means it would be very easy to create a portrait that didn’t look like him. But Obama it was, and I did my best!

Bernard’s is on the left, and mine on the right. The judges commented on the difficulty of judging this one, and ultimately gave me the win (3.5 to 1.5, with another tied judge) because Bernard’s “looks too old” or “has a weird chin“! One judge commented that neither looked like Obama. Regardless, the contest was now tied!

At this point I was making the observation that Bernard, on average, was strong with faces but weak with heads and hair, whereas I was the latter. Look at all the entries and see if you agree! One judge who is an artistic prodigy herself (JK) created this composite Obama from both our portraits to illustrate our respected strengths:

It looks more like him than either of ours doesn’t it?!?

Albert Einstein

My final choice was a bad one. I should have chosen Gene Simmons, or David Bowie (which I deferred since I assumed he would be Bernard’s last). But for some weird reason I went with Einstein, and he was a real challenge to draw.

Mine is on the left, Bernard’s on the right. The judges gave Bernard the win in another 3.5 to 1.5 split, although the comments weirdly praised mine more (one said “Your hair and shading is better but I choose right“)! By now I had gotten used to the arbitrary decisions of the judges, and even though I question whether Bernard’s actually looks like Einstein I concede mine was weaker and expected a greater blowout in the scores.

Nine subjects completed and the score is Bernard has 5 wins over my 4. I had to win the last one to tie!

Marilyn Monroe

Bernard’s final choice was not Bowie. Instead, surprisingly, he chose Marilyn! And she was easily the hardest of the entire contest. This was magnified by the pressure on me to win.

My entry was the right, Bernard’s the left. He went with realism, me with a stylistic approach. The only problem: neither of them look like Marilyn Monroe! Four of the five judges said this, and commented how their decision was therefore based on artistic style. Two judges (and myself) commented how Bernard’s strongly resembled someone other than Marilyn (although we can’t quite place who), and two admired the bold colours of my piece.

Perhaps unsurprisingly considering these responses, the vote was a complete tie: 2.5 points each! The first tie in the contest was the last entry, and both our non-Marilyns were deemed equal πŸ™‚

Incidentally I can now reveal that I actually made four Marilyn’s, rejecting each of them until I found one I liked. I knew my stylistic choice would work against the judges, but I greatly preferred it to the previous three, which were these:

I wonder how the judges would have liked the above?

Final Results!

Ten portraits done and judged. Fifty individual votes! It’s time for the results. And they are…

Bernard won, with 5.5 wins to my 4.5!

Looking at total points, of the 50 available, the final tally was Bernard 26.5 to my 23.5. That means that ultimately the final decision came down to only 1.5 votes out of 50! That’s extremely close πŸ™‚

Looking back at all the portraits now, it’s obvious that our skills increased as the contest went on, and many times I felt I was presenting the judges with a difficult choice! Alas they were only human; it’s obvious Bernard’s Elvis win was a flagrant mockery of the (then) rules and my Queen was much better than his. But at the same time he claims his Obama was the better and (I suspect) will say the same about his Margot Robbie Marilyn.

I’m packing up Bernard’s prize right now – which is a quality item indeed – and wondering if we’ll ever do this again. And if we do, what we should draw. Any ideas?

Ramen 8: World of Chook!

Saturday, July 10th, 2021

Time for more chicken ramen!

Lucky Me Chicken (300 Calories, 14 g fat, 1410 mg sodium)

This is a weirdly tasting product, vaguely like ‘Chinese food’ but not at all like (artificial) chicken. The more I ate the greasier it tasted, and about halfway through it had become so repulsive I couldn’t finish it. But I suspect this was more me than the product, and it may be a taste enjoyed by some? An unsure 4/10.

Mama (260 Calories, 11 g fat, 1420 mg sodium)

Another imported product, this time for the Thai market. Once again this tasted nothing like the ‘chicken’ taste I’m used to, and instead was reminiscent of burned toast. The broth was weirdly dark and oily, and the noodles gelatinous. One of the worst I’ve tasted in the dozens I’ve eaten so far. An easy 0/10.

Tradition Chicken Style Noodle Bowl (340 Calories, 15 g fat, 1430 mg sodium)

The last two products by this manufacturer were bad, but I wondered if one of them had a defect since it didn’t contain any flavor. So when I opened this larger-sized version of the same thing I was optimistic since it had not one but two flavor packets – and a tiny fork!

Alas, once prepared it smelled just as bad as the brick version that I also reviewed last time. It’s a truly awful smell – like a dark old house – and difficult to ignore. The noodles had the consistency of electrical wiring and the taste was like dirty water. After three products by this manufacturer, I wonder who their audience is?

I’d give this maybe 1/10, but this score is tempered by the fact that KLS ate it! I therefore asked for her comments, and she said: “Bland and inoffensive, 4/10!”

Fireworks 2021

Tuesday, July 6th, 2021

We let fireworks off for July 4! Since they’d been made illegal here in Albany we went to Rochester and let them off with J and J.

That’s most of them, and as you can see we had quite a few! Here’s some highlights:

Of course it was great fun; lots of sparks and noise and flashes. The entire neighborhood echoed with the sound of people letting off bigger fireworks, but we enjoyed our modest selection πŸ™‚

We had a BBQ and ate too much as well.

We had no idea what some of the fireworks actually did and had a few nice surprises when they went high into the air or did something else spectacular. Here’s a compilation video:

It was a great evening. Happy July 4!

Portrait Contest: Halftime

Friday, June 25th, 2021

Bernard and I are having another contest, and this time it’s an art contest! To be specific: portraits. We’re each creating portraits and they are judged by the same five judges as last years postcard contest. While we’re sending these to each other on postcards, the cards themselves have no role in the judging this time.

The rules were simple: we would alternate choosing the subjects week by week, and create neck up portraits in any medium or style. The judges decision would be final.

That was five weeks ago, and we’re now halfway through. Let’s review the results so far!

Elvis Presley

I started choosing subjects with The King and right out of the gate Bernard ignored the ‘neck up’ rule with his ‘portrait’ (on the left)! The judges gave it to him 4-1, but since comments were as blatant as “Wins because of the pose” and “Wins only because of the guitar” I felt the contest had derailed almost immediately. Nonetheless the judges decision was final and Bernard took the early lead.

Arnold Schwarzenegger

The best subjects are ones with many different looks, and you can see from my watercolour (on the left) and Bernard’s pencil sketch that Arnie fits the bill! The judges were torn on this one, and one even declared a tie, but ultimately Conan defeated The Terminator and I won 3.5 – 1.5. Judges comments included “Conan is too slick” and “Terminator doesn’t have enough color”.

Cleopatra

Perhaps I chose Cleo since I expected an easy win, but it’s certain I wasn’t prepared for the magnus opus created by Bernard (on the right). KLS joked that mine (on the left) was very masculine, but even had I demonstrated a better grasp of facial anatomy I daresay Bernard would still have got – as he deserved – the 5-0 win. Incidentally while the photos don’t show it well, both of these feature metallic inks! Judges comments included “The detail is extraordinary!

Bruce Lee

Bernard chose Bruce Lee, perhaps because he had an image in mind? But Cleo had lit a bonfire under me and there was no way I was handing him another win, so I started taking things seriously. My portrait (on the right) swept all judges for a decisive 5-0 win. Comments included “I love the eyes” and “Excellent use of shading“.

Steve Irwin

We agreed to let Kristin and Lakshmi choose a subject each, and KLS was first up with her choice of the crocodile hunter himself! This was a difficulty subject since he’s so known for holding animals that it was hard to produce a neck-up image that conveyed his essence well. I took a bold approach with the stencil art on the left, and Bernard… well he chose to ignore the rules again. Once again the judges overlooked this infraction and gave him the 5-0 win, even commenting (as one did) that he won “even though it isn’t a portrait”. As for my image, I expect this is not a contest that will reward a novel approach and will return to more conventional styles ahead!

So halfway though, Bernard is up 3-2. Since two of his wins were (arguably) due to images that flaunted the rules the neck-up rule has now been abandoned.

Five more subjects to come, and it’s still anyone’s game! Who will we draw, and who will win? Find out in five weeks!

My Eye

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2021

Almost exactly a year ago, when I was getting ready for bed, I walked down our darkened hallway and saw a dramatic flash of light to my left. It was very brief but also very bright, and resembled the strobing effect from a phone when you have the ringer set to the flash.

It happened several times over a half hour or so and was very alarming. A quick google search showed this wasn’t something to ignore so we headed to the ER. It was about midnight.

They did some tests to rule out unlikely causes (which included a stroke) and did an ultrasound on my eye to rule out foreign objects and more extreme causes. Since there was no critical danger they referred me to a specialist, who I went and saw the next day.

It was then I found that the flashes were an aging effect, due to the vitreous gel in my eye changing into a liquid state (as it does as we age) and pulling on the retina in the process. While flashes themselves are normal and not a sign of great concern, the sudden appearance and frequency of the flashes I was having was an early warning sign that my retina may have been tearing. The doctor told me what to watch for, and sent me home.

Less than a week later, my retina tore. I was watching TV and suddenly with no warning an ‘explosion’ of black smoke seemed to fill my left eye. This was blood that had been released when the retina tore. I called the doctor, and he told me to come in the next morning.

The top side of my left retina had torn off the back of my eye, and I needed laser surgery to ‘staple’ the retina down to prevent further damage. The surgery was scheduled for later that same day, and while brief was exquisitely painful since the location of my damage coincided with a nerve. The procedure was a success, and after many follow ups over the next few weeks I was given a clean bill of eye health.

The thing is, things were hardly back to normal. The blood in my eye – as well as microscopic pieces of retina that had torn off – caused me to have floaters clouding my vision for many months. I also had regular eye pain and blurriness. I was unable to focus for long periods on close objects (like a handheld gaming system) and I developed an intense light sensitivity in that eye. It was an ongoing struggle, especially using a computer. Not an ideal situation when I was teaching 375 students in an online-only course.

A year later, most of these symptoms have happily passed, but some (occasional blurriness, light sensitivity) remain.

What I didn’t know was that the retinal damage changed the prescription in my eye quite a lot. I didn’t go to the optometrist until a couple of weeks ago (due to covid, and the assumption vision issues were not prescription related) and by then my brain had accommodated what had become an incorrect prescription. The optometrist told me the change in my left eye was ‘many years worth’ compared to my right eye, and now my new glasses are taking much longer to get used to as my brain struggles to recalibrate the left eye.

I’m very aware that this past year I’ve often used my eye as an excuse. But the pain and discomfort was often difficult to deal with, and I can assure you that one thing we take for granted – our vision – is almost impossible to ignore when it goes wrong. Things have definitely improved in my eye over the past year, but I’m not back to ‘normal’ yet and to be honest am not quite sure I ever will be.

The moral of this story: don’t age! And if you do, don’t ignore sudden flashes in your vision!