The Great Easter Chocolate Battle

April 25th, 2017

I have fond childhood memories of large foil-wrapped chocolate Easter eggs, and this year I bought some for old times sake.

Here then, a brief review. 


I’m a Cadbury fan from way back, and a maniac consumer of their ‘mini eggs’ so even at $7, the above was irresistible. 

But as you can see, the reality was quite underwhelming. The egg contained only four mini eggs, and they were all broken! Even worse, the egg itself was awful, a criminal example of Hershey branding some of their own vomitous ‘chocolate’ as Cadbury. (Hershey licenses Cadbury brand here, and don’t use the Cadbury formula for all products they label with the name.)

In short: a terribly disappointing product and a rip-off to boot. A good amount of it went into the trash…


This was $10, a Lindt egg packaged with a generous amount of truffle eggs. The price was high (I could have bought two medium Lindt rabbits for the same money) but the packaging was lovely!

But the egg was delicious! Every bit as good as you’d expect; wonderful creamy Lindt chocolate with varying thickness depending on how it set just like I remember. I ate this like a fiend and loved every morsel. The little eggs were too rich for me, but the product was great even without them!

So a very clear winner here: the Lindt egg smashed the Cadbury one into the ground. What more needs to be said?

Well…


I also picked up the above (for $5). I was very hesitant upon opening it, recalling the evil taste of the ‘fakebury’ egg I’d cast into the trash the day before, but this rabbit was sublime.

Here it was: the beloved Cadbury taste. The best chocolate in the world in the shape of a lovely Easter bunny. Every bite was bliss, and even better it made me forget the awful egg.

So in the end Easter was saved! It was a lot of chocolate though. I may have to cut back next year πŸ˜‰

Ten More Treasures

April 20th, 2017

I’m in the middle of a lengthy reorganization of our ‘library’ room, which contains 6 bookshelves and loads of books, toys and other stuff. I spend a lot of time in this room doing my crafting and hobbie stuff and I’ve wanted to reorganize it for years.

This has entailed throwing away some books (and magazines, of which I had scads), putting others in storage, and generally moving stuff around. It’s taken ages, been harder than I thought, but has at the same time been a lot of fun since I’ve ‘rediscovered’ so much stuff I had almost forgotten I owned or simply hasn’t had the attention it deserved.

This then is a post containing ten items that live in the room. All unusual, all treasured, and all still getting a featured position in the reorganized library πŸ™‚

PS2 Slime controller (2005). This is a fully functional PlayStation 2 controller modeled after the famous slime from the Dragon Quest series. I bought it when it came out but never used it much since it’s uncomfortable to hold. Over the years it’s become a bit sticky since it has a rubber surface and while it’s appreciated in value it’ll just sit smiling on my shelf for ever πŸ™‚

Viewtiful Joe bobblehead (2003). This was a promotional item given away with early purchases of the game. It’s ceramic, looks like a bootleg and the head is a bit too heavy for the spring. It’s weird and has been a shelf fixture for over a decade. Amusingly this item is now ‘worth’ more than the game on eBay!

Darth Maul cookie jar (1999). I’ve mentioned this before on the blog; it was my first (and last? ever QVC purchase and is still my favourite piece of Phantom Menace merchandise. It’s fairly large (about 20 cm tall) but impractical for storage so for me it’s always been decorative. Another item that has appreciated in value.

A tiny castle (?). I don’t know where or when I got this but it may very well date to my teenage years. Items like this (and little dragons) were somewhat common decades ago and I always liked them and used to own a few. Alas this is my only one now and I love it. Incidentally if you ever see anything like this (the very small size is important) it may make a good gift…

Bootleg R2 droid figure (?). I got this in England last year, specifically by trading tickets for it in an arcade in Margate. I like R2 figures, and something about this one – with its wrong colours and mismatched leg lengths – is endearing. Although 100% bootleg, this is a key item in my Star Wars collection πŸ™‚

Burger King bobblehead (2006). These were sold at Burger King to promote the Super Bowl over a decade ago! It’s so weird I love it. Another item that is ‘worth’ (on eBay) several times what I paid for it.

R2-D2 plastic mug (2012). This was sold (and may still be today) at the Disney movie park in Florida. It’s gigantic, and yes I found space for it in my suitcase when we visited 5 years ago πŸ™‚

Dragonlance stained glass (1997). These were sold for $90 exclusively at the Gen-Con convention in 1997. I bought this a couple of years ago for much less at a local shop, and the seller had had it since she bought it at Gen Con back when they were sold! It’s quite pretty, made of painted glass with real metal lines between the colours. I’d like to hang it but it’s quite heavy and I don’t have an appropriate window so it rests against the wall. It’s tough to find these (there were three designs) for sale now but they seem to go for a premium.

Darth Maul glass ornament (2010?). It’s hard to find info on this online. I’m pretty sure I bought it at Target, which means it should have been fairly common, but I can’t find any on auction or sold online so I’m not exactly sure when it came out. It’s a highly detailed blown glass Christmas ornament modeled (again) after Darth Maul from Star Wars. It’s super creepy but also lovely and another treasure in my SW collection. No I’ve never put it in the Christmas tree!

This Doctor Who trading card (1996). This is card #26 from the 1996 Cornerstone Doctor Who card set. I’ll admit my memories of how I obtained this are clouded… can one of you fill me in? (No I didn’t write that outrageous slander on the card!)

My next goal is to organize the attic. Lord knows what I may find up there! If I ever get around to it, you can expect to see some very unusual ‘treasures’ here once I’m done!

Bonus Game Included (on c-side)!

April 13th, 2017

Back in 1983, Pete Shelley (ex-Buzzcocks) released his second solo LP called XL1. Despite having great success with his first album, mostly due to the hit single Homosapien, this followup wasn’t very successful. And yet it was a bit of a landmark album for a very unusual reason:Β  the album came with a piece of ZX Spectrum computer software.

For those unaware, games were often distributed on tape in those days. Rather than using digital media, computers often input data via an audio signal, which therefore meant using cassettes or (much less commonly) vinyl records to distribute software. This was the heyday of the 8-bit games industry, and more cassettes containing software were being sold than containing music. It was a natural idea for a band to include software on a record… but Pete Shelley was the first to do it.

While the program was nothing more than a visualizer, it may have been the very first visualizer! The idea was you’d load it up on your spectrum and start it playing at the same time as the record, and then watch the pretty visuals play out on the screen while you sang along with the lyrics. Here’s the whole thing on Youtube (remember the software itself was silent):

Here is a fascinating account of the production of the software by the guy that made it. I particularly like how they put out a lock-groove on the vinyl version to save speakers (and ears!) since the raw audio of the code is just screeching white noise. Amusingly, in researching this post i found a forum post where someone described returning the cassette to swap it for the version without the game since he hated having to fast-forward through the screeching sound of the software every time he listened to the album πŸ™‚

I can’t find any reports on whether this was a success, or even made a ripple in the games/music industry. I’m sure it was a novelty, but I wonder how many Pete Shelley fans made use of this even in those days? Either way it hardly set a precedent, and I know of no other examples of a band including visualizers on their albums…

In the early 1980s text adventures were a big deal, and successful enough that there was even a ‘do it yourself’ program called The Quill that allowed anyone to make their own game. One such person that did was Dave Greenfield, member of the band The Stranglers. He wrote a game called Aural Quest that was included at the end of side two of the (cassette only) versions of their 1984 album Aural Sculpture:

It’s a long-ish game (for a text adventure) in which you play the manager of the band as they tour around the world (starting in the UK, via Europe to Tokyo and eventually Brisbane) and get into misadventures. It was apparently quite challenging and since it was mostly ignored by the gaming press in those days players must have had a terrible time beating it without assistance. Here’s a video of a playthrough:

As best I can tell, this was the first and quite possibly only game actually included on an officially released album. Certainly it was the only game released on an album in audio format; if software was ever included these days it would be as a digital file on the CD. (Let’s ignore for the fact that even CDs are mostly dead…)

As a last curiosity, how about the Thompson Twins game? They were a synthpop band from the early 1980s, and in 1984 a ZX Spectrum game based on their single Doctor Doctor was released on flexi-disc only as a promo attached to a computer games magazine:

The game was a graphic-adventure, quite short and apparently quite bad. It lives on via emulation and you can see a full playthrough of the c64 version on Youtube:

This release is remarkable for many reasons:
– The fact that it was ever made in the first place
– The fact that it was only distributed as a free magazine promotional item
– The fact that it was distributed on vinyl disc rather than cassette

This last fact is notable: users would have had to record the disc onto cassette first before being able to load it into their computers. This wouldn’t have been difficult, but is just an unnecessary step and is probably what led to flexidisc software distribution never catching on! (Wikipedia has a good article on this game including the development, and additional research suggests the oft-delayed c64 disc version is extremely rare these days.)

I was a Thompson Twins fan in those days. I would have played this! I suspect the flexi was stripped from magazine covers in Oz though, and I can barely believe any Australian readers sent off for the c64 disc? Adam… did you?

And that’s that. I became curious about the idea of 8-bit band-related software-on-albums a while ago and this post has been percolating for some time. But despite my attempts this is all I can find. There were of course unofficial items (such asΒ  Jethro Tull and Beatles adventures written on The Quill) and actual games based on bands (Frankie Goes To Hollywood) but none of these were distributed by the band or on vinyl record.

However… there was another unusual method of software distribution in the 1980s, in some ways even stranger than including code on vinyl albums. Maybe that’ll become a future post…

Sinanju

April 8th, 2017

It’s been over a week since my last post (blame illness!) and quite some time since a dedicated Gundam post. Mostly the latter is due to my recent builds being quick-and-easy kits probably not worth their own posting, but this guy is a bit different:

This is Sinanju, a robot I know nothing at all about (since I neither watch the series or read the comics). However this is the first ‘Real Grade’ (RG) Gundam kit I ever bought and I’ve been very much looking forward to making it. While RG kits have been around for a few years, the only one that I had previously fallen in love with I actually bought and gave to SFL, so making that myself would have been ‘copying’ (to steal a term from AW) and only the worst sort of person would do that!

So when Sinanju came along with his gold trim and glossy red luster I had to have him! Here’s what was inside the box:

There are hundreds of Gundams in many different styles and levels of detail but very broadly they can be catalogued into four types:
1) High Grade (HG): Smaller (1/144 scale), easy-to-make and inexpensive (<$20)
2) Real Grade (RG): Smaller (1/144), more detailed than HG, more complex to build and more expensive ($35+)
3) Master Grade (MG): Larger (1/100), highly detailed with many more parts and higher complexity. Can get pricey ($50++)
4) Perfect Grade (PG): Super detailed, with insane detail and features such as LED lights. For true maniacs. ($hundreds)
I’ve made many HG kits, two MG’s (with another on my shelf waiting) and as I said this was my first RG. So how was it?

Well in short, complicated! As with most Gundam kits you start with the feet, and it was very quickly apparent that despite the lower price point and smaller size this was no less complex than the two MG kits I have already made. Here’s a shot showing one of the legs in the early stages of assemlby:

You can see the internal ‘skeleton’ onto which the superstructure connects, and then the outer armour (in red) on top of that. The three pieces shown include dozens of individual parts, and at times it very much seemed like the designers had broken an obvious single piece into two or more pieces just to drive up the part count of the kit. That said I was impressed with how well it all goes together, not to mention the (mind-boggling) level of articulation the finished piece has. Here’s two legs next to each other:

The difference here is only the the left leg (on the right of the picture) doesn’t yet have it’s armour. When finished, here they both are:

I posed these so you can see how much the piece can be manipulated to show the retro rockets when in flight mode. Otherwise these two are identical mirrors of each other, and all the rockets hide away nicely when the armour is closed up. Despite being an entirely plastic kit there are all sorts of moving pistons and joints underneath this armour and even the foot has about four joints which comes in very handy when trying to stand the finished model!

Here’s the legs attached to the waist with the skit armour attached:

This photo would have been taken after many hours of assembly. There is no paint or glue used at all, and you can appreciate how finely engineered the kit is by how well the gold-and-black pieces go together and how shiny the gold looks. There are also some flexible plastic pieces (such as the tubing in this photo) which are uncommon in HG level kits.

Now I took a few more in-progress shots but apparently deleted them so let’s jump now to the completed kit, which probably took at least ten hours over a few weeks:

It’s large and bulky and extravagant but stands easily with no support! As with most Gundam kits, it comes with a wealth of weapon options but I only opted for the sword and shield. If you like you can make guns, cannons and a polearm type weapon. It’s very poseable as well, so if you buy a stand you can put it in any sort of flying or attacking pose you wish. Here’s a side-view shot:

I’m very impressed with how he turned out, and he’s going in my curio alongside the two MG kits. While he’s not quite at their level of detail, he’s also quite a bit less expensive! As my first RG kit, this was a fun – albeit complex – build that ended up looking just as good as I’d hoped, and I’m sure there will be more RG kits in my future. If you’re new to Gundams though I’d recommend you start off with a HG kit or two before diving into RG. (Florence, this means Bearguy first!)

One last comment about Sinanju: there’s actually a pricey (~$120) MG version of him with more detail and ‘titanium gloss’ plastic. It looks incredible. I wonder if I can find it cheaper in Japan in a couple of months…?

Oz vs USA: The Great Bug Battle

March 28th, 2017

SMC recently asked me: “What sort of insects do you get in your garden?” A simple question indeed, but what memories it brought back! Being outdoors in Australia, especially in summer and especially near (or working with) plants always means being around insects, but things are quite different here. I could go outside and cut down bushes or plant flowers or just mow the lawn for an hour or more and never see a single insect. And when I do they’re rarely amazing or scary or beautiful or dangerous like the sorts of things I remember from my youth!

So let’s have a faceoff, comparing categories in terms of common garden insects. You can decide which garden wins!

Lepidoptera (Butterflies, Moths etc)

The simple fact is that butterflies and moths seem more common in Australia than they are here in the northeast. My guess is winter has something to do with this (and Florida may be full of butterflies) but they are uncommon enough here that whenever I see one it’s noteworthy. And when that happens, they are usually small and not particularly colourful. Of course butterflies are always pretty, but I recall much more spectacular examples in my youth than I see here. Australian moths always seemed larger and – if this doesn’t sound strange – scarier than those I see here. Overall moths are more common in our garden than butterflies.

That’s a wooly bear moth, probably the most common garden moth I see in these parts. It’s not the most exotic (that would be hemaris thysbe, that we saw once in our garden back in Marcy) but it’s pretty enough and has a lovely fluffy caterpillar! If I were to think of the most common butterfly/moth in my garden, it’s probably this guy. You read a list of common NY state butterflies and moths here.

That’s the common crow butterfly, apparently one of the most common in Australia. It’s inedible, so birds avoid it. I remember these guys everywhere in my youth. It’s not the prettiest butterfly, but it’s fairly large and very striking!

Blattodea (cockroaches)

No contest; Australia wins hands down. During any single one of my annual trips to Oz I see more cockroaches than I have probably seen during my nearly 25 years here in the US. Plus the Australian ones are larger, more mobile and in general more handsome than the little guys I’ve seen here.

Odonata (dragonflies etc.)

I’d say these are reasonably-to-very rare in the garden, but then we don’t live particularly close to enough water. When we see them they’re usually small and drably coloured. As a youth we lived near creeks a few times and dragonflies were therefore reasonably common in our garden (and I used to enjoy hunting the larvae in the creeks). In general I remember Australian dragonflies being quite vibrantly coloured and more abundant than what I see here. (As an aside, NSW apparently has about 300 species of dragonflies compared to NY state having about 190, only 80 of which are ‘common’.)

Orthoptera (grasshoppers and crickets)

Grasshoppers are very rare here. I’m actually struggling to remember the last time I saw one! In Australia they are bonkers common, and indeed were one of my favourite ‘bug catcher’ targets as a kid (read this post). Many were the times when I caught grashoppers as big as my palm, and would study them for hours before releasing them. Here’s the most common type (called common, hedge or giant grasshopper), which is about 5 cm long but can grow to almost twice that and seemed to be abundant everywhere during the summers down under:

There are many other types in Australia as well of all shapes and sizes, including the green guys with long ‘horns’ (as I called them as a child), the grass pyrgomorph:

As I said I’m struggling to think of any grasshoppers I’ve ever seen in the garden here, much less at all. But crickets… crickets are common… just not ever seen!

That’s a field cricket, a little (<2 cm) guy that is probably the most common insect in our backyard. We rarely ever see them since they are nocturnal, but we hear them in mid summer when they start to chirp. Sometimes it seems the yard is full of crickets so loud is the chirping, and it’s a lovely sound to drift off to sleep to. I’m sure Australia has chirping crickets as well, but I don’t remember anything like the intensity we get up here in the northeast.

As with many insects they can’t survive the winter, so the chirping is only for a little while. It’s a rite of summer, and one we always look forward to and enjoy.

Mantodea (praying mantis etc.)

Another class of insect that is common in Australian gardens but very rare to the point of nonexistent here. I’m struggling to recall if I’ve ever seen one in my garden yet feel quite familiar with them due to my exposure in the gardens of my youth. They are not nonexistent in NY state, just (apparently) not particularly common.

Australia is (in)famous for the abundance and size of both praying mantissa (yes I invented that plural) and stick insects (see below) and I was fascinated by them as a child. Praying mantis in particular ranged from tiny little guys that fit on the tip of your finger through to the ‘king mantis’ easily as big as your open hand. I remember putting them on my shirt and marveling at how they would grab on with their claws when you tried to lift them off.

Phasmatodea (stick insects etc.)

This one is another no brainer. Not only does the NY state garden fail miserably at delivering even a single stick insect (to the best of my memory), but the Australia garden only need to contribute one competitor for an easy win. Ladies and gentleman, may I present the goliath stick insect:

There are a lot of stick insects in Oz, ranging from the tiny to the monstrous (like the above). They are common – or were when I was a kid – and while the goliaths were rare in the garden (apparently they prefer to live high in a trees canopy) we saw them from time to time. More common were brown ones that weren’t much smaller but would nearly perfectly camouflage themselves as twigs.

Hymenoptera (bees, wasps & ants)

This category would be the one with the smallest difference between Australian and US gardens in my opinion. When I do see an insect, it’s almost always (maybe 75% of the time) a bee, wasp or ant. Most are unremarkable, especially the ants, and most just walk/buzz around doing their own thing.

That’s a bumblebee, which are fairly common in our garden in summer. We have a specific bush in our backyard that seems to attract them when it’s in flower, and they are also fans of black-eyed-susan flowers which we have a lot of. I love their loud buzzing, and the fact that they happily continue their work seemingly oblivious (or at least unconcerned) of me as I watch them. Plus they’re cute!

That’s a yellowjacket, a type of wasp very common here. Several years ago some of these even tried to kill me! As a result I am wary of these guys, who build nests on our around our house every year and always make me run away when I see them in the garden πŸ™‚

Diptera (flies)

Again, Australia wins hands down. Flies are rare here in the northeast, so much so it’s remarkable to see one (especially indoors). My memories of summer in Australia are not complete without swarms of flies and I can assure you since I only just recently returned from there they are still common today πŸ™‚

Hemiptera (true bugs)

Australia wins hands down. While we get the occasional cicada here, they are not a ‘rite of summer’ (to quote myself!) as they are in Oz. If I could import any insect en masse, it would certainly be cicadas. (I wrote about them here.)

Coleoptera (beetles)

After bees/wasps/ants, I’d say this is the second most common category of insect we see in gardens here. In fact, beetles may be even more common proportionally than in Australia. That said the variety doesn’t seem as profound, and indeed the following three types represent the majority of beetles we see in our garden:

Ladybugs are fairly common, and pretty much the same as the ones I’ve seen in Oz or for that matter anywhere in the world. Back when we owned the house in Marcy they spawned in the woods out back one time and we had swarms of them in our yard. Thousands of them, and obviously many of them got into the house as well. Since they are pretty and harmless little guys this was no problem, and for a few days we were ladybug central. I’ve never seen an abundance quite like that since.

Japanese beetles are the scourge of American gardens, and so common that you can go to the store and purchase any number of products specifically designed to prevent (or kill) them. They descend on plants and ruin them in a few days, and KLS hates them! I’m sure they are equally common in Australia, only I don’t remember them in favour of the (bigger and prettier) Christmas Beetles.

Fireflies are common here in late summer, and we often see them in the backyard blinking at night. While they exist in Australia, I don’t remember ever seeing any before coming to the US, and the first few times I spotted them I was dazzled. It’s fun to try to catch these guys, since the flash – while bright – is short enough that if the firefly is flying around randomly you never manage to actually reach him. I’ve caught a few though, and watched them flash in my hand from close-up before releasing them. Lovely, pretty little things and a welcome visitor to our backyard.

I could go on into more exotic categories (such as Plecoptera or Diplura) but this is (more than!) enough and covers the common differences. I also avoided spiders, since as everyone knows Australia just beats every other countries gardens down into the ground in that category!

So the take-away: The variety, freqency, size and even quality of backyard insects in Oz eclipses America, at least in my experience. But certain star players – the crickets and fireflies for instance – mean that the gardens here don’t lack insect charm of their own.

Besides, you may hate bugs. In which case you probably should avoid ever thinking about moving to Australia πŸ™‚