Postcrossing Update

Through Postcrossing, I’ve now sent 1624 postcards and received 1604. These are increases of about 200 cards since my last update five months ago, which means my average of 40 cards a month remains unchanged.

As far as countries, there have been no changes since the last update, with the top ranks (sent and received from) the same and no new countries added. About a third of my cards are sent to and received from Germany.

It’s always fun to remove the cards from my P.O. Box, since I never know what to expect. Unlike some users, I don’t have a large list of preferred types – and no restricted cards – so what I receive tends to run the gamut.

I do mention that I like vintage tourist cards, so I get a decent amount of them. A lot of Postcrossers don’t like such cards, so I hope users are happy to find someone that does!

If you’re wondering, other card types that people usually say they don’t like are ad cards, homemade cards, animal cards and religious cards.

I seem to have gotten a lot of celebrity cards these past five months, and I’m actually considering adding a line to my bio asking for postcards of very obscure or forgotten celebrities just to see who I get!

I have added ‘fantasy’ to my short preferred list, but so far very few in that category have arrived. I tell people if they have any particularly strange or unusual card to send it my way, but so far I’ve not seen anything that has greatly surprised me 🙂

Three of the cards I received since the last update are ‘maxicards’. These are postcards featuring a stamp affixed to the art side that is identical or thematically similar to the card art. These are usually sold by postal services, although independently produced versions exist. I’ve got a lot of these from Postcrossers over the years, and maybe I’ll do a post on them one day.

Maxicards have been produced by Australia post for decades, and Adam seems to have gotten his hands on a bunch of older ones which he has been sending me periodically. I wonder where he got them from?

I continue to get a lot of unusually shaped stamps, and the one from Finland at top right is particular interesting. The ‘missing’ part of the stamp is also a stamp, and I’d actually received it from a different sender some time ago. The USA should do a stamp set where each state is its own stamp!

Most postal services are struggling with a drop in people sending mail, and one popular method to raise revenue continues to be issuing licensed stamps. Very often these are sold as collectibles and therefore people rarely use them for postage, but when I travel I always try to buy and use such stamps.

The UK issues a lot of these sorts of stamps, and I seem to be getting more and more on recent cards (possibly since the QR codes on the ‘normal’ stamps are ugly). The podracing stamp above is quite large and one of my favourite stamps I’ve received so far!

I received two very special things these past five months. The first was the above acrylic painting of a cute duck! This is my second piece of original painted art received through Postcrossing, and as you can see it’s incredibly good. I messaged the artist and she said she painted it and liked it so much she and hung on her wall for a year before she mailed it. She was nervous the recipient wouldn’t appreciate it but I assured her we did. Now we’ll frame this and hang it on our wall.

The second amazing delivery came from a Japanese user. When I read her bio she mentioned she really loved stamps, so I used a large card and filled it with about 20 different stamps. This made her super happy, and she messaged me saying she wanted to send me something in return. I agreed, and a month or so later found an envelope in my PO Box that contained a packet of older Japanese stamps! She mentioned I can use this on my next trip to Japan, which I absolutely will.

But that wasn’t all she sent: the envelope also contained eight Ultraseven postcards! These are beautiful, featuring classic art from one of the most important Ultra series of all time. I’ll be sending these all to myself from Japan over the years. I was so happy with what she sent me I will be sending her another card loaded with stamps, this time from Australia 🙂

Right now I can send 41 cards at a time, and usually ‘do postcards’ weekly so I’ve always got the maximum amount in transit to users around the world. I send/receive about 10 a week, which is a lot but not too many, and I’m happy to continue at this rate for the time being.

Ramen 31: March Of The Ramen Queen

It’s been a long time since the last post reviewing some chicken ramen, but I’ve (finally!) found a few more. Let’s see what I thought…

Cup Noodles Chicken (290 Calories, 11g fat, 1160 mg sodium)

This is a new version of one of the ubiquitous chicken ramens, with the difference being it’s in a paper cup and intended to be cooked in a microwave. I followed the instructions (2.5 minutes at maximum) and it worked well, although the paper cup was much hotter to hold than the styrofoam version. The contents seemed a bit ‘blobby’ after cooking, but a quick stir and everything was ok.

As far as taste this was simply acceptable. As with the ‘normal’ version the flavour is cooked into the noodles and it lacks veggies aside from a few tiny pieces of corn and carrot. In a world with no other options this would be ok, but with better available I won’t be trying it again. I’ll give it 7/10.

Oolongmen Chicken Ramyun (310 Calories, 10g fat, 1430 mg sodium)

This was purchased in Canada, and I didn’t eat it for months since most of the other Canadian ones were awful. But when I finally got to this, I was pleasantly surprised!

The first taste was unusual – arguably not like chicken at all – and the ramen contained lots of veggies included dehydrated mushrooms. Subsequent forkfulls were better, and since I actually ate it all I deem this a higher-quality product, probably in the top 10% of those I’ve tasted. I’ll score it 8/10.

Cup Noodles Rice With Noodles Teriyaki Chicken (300 Calories, 5g fat, 1100 mg sodium)

I know this isn’t a ramen product, but since it clearly says ‘with noodles‘ I purchased it anyway. It’s another microwave-only product, and after the required 4.5 minutes on high the contents had become a sort of brown slush.

I was hesitant since the sickly sweet smell was reminiscent of rot, and when I tentatively tried a small forkful my fears were confirmed since this was one of very worst cup noodle products I have ever tasted. I hated this, and even now regret preparing it since the stench has filled the house. Score: 0/10.

I know brands I haven’t yet tried exist, but I’ve never seen them in local stores. I wonder how long it will be until my next installment?

90s-Era Trading Cards

Last year I purchased four old packs of trading cards. They’ve been aging for over six months now and it’s time to open them and see what’s inside…

Tools released these The Rocketeer cards in 1992 and they’re typical of most of their series from that era. The plastic wrapper had become brittle and disintegrated a bit upon opening.

The pack contained the eight photo cards shown above, and they’re all a bit dark and muddy to my eye. Interestingly I saw this film for the first time last year, didn’t think it was very good, and I would have had zero interest in these cards upon release even were I still buying cards then.

The backs of the cards are a little difficult to read due to lack of ink. All of them were like this; maybe it was a production error? As I’ve said before I prefer the synopsis extracts on the backs of sets like this, although for this film I wonder how many read them?

There was a single (non die-cut) sticker in the pack as well, and it’s this somewhat boring movie poster style art. The adhesive had completely failed after 33 years, and when I peeled it off it wouldn’t stick to anything.

Overall a by-the-books set for a somewhat mundane film. I don’t think too many were enthusiastic for these cards when they released.

I’ve not heard of ‘Star Pics’, the company who released these Alien 3 cards, also in 1992. This was a famously troubled film production, and the result divides fans to this day.

Much like the previous packs (and admittedly the film), the cards are muddy and quite ugly. They’re also thin and flimsy, which indicate a low budget product. The screenshots are a bit blurry, which is unfortunate considering they would have been the feature cards of the set.

The backs are ugly and hard to read, but they tell a first-person account of the events of the film. An interesting approach that I think works well, but I wish the design had been more suitable for the theme.

Like other early 90s sets there’s no chase cards, and the budget feel of the material is probably indicative of the publisher. But this set is notably worse than the original Topps Alien set from over a decade earlier, which shouldn’t have been the case.

From 1996, this is a pack of Independence Day cards from Topps. We’re in the chase card era now, and the wrappers says I have a 1 in 9 chance of a hologram card!

I didn’t get one. The above were the six cards in the pack, and you can see they’re in a 16:9 aspect ratio which Topps used for their ‘Widevision’ cards for several years back then.

This is a very poor set. The screenshots are all blurry and pixilated, which is unforgivable in a set that is focused around displaying the images at a larger size. Some of the cards even look like they were photographs of a screen, rather than taken from film stock. Awful.

Furthermore, every card in the pack had ‘edge wear’ along the bottoms, which was likely caused by the machines that cut them. This is of no matter to me now since they’re going directly into the recycling bin, but imagine paying a premium for these packs 29 years ago and finding all the cards were damaged?

A very disappointing product, and another example of how Topps had fallen by the mid 90s.

I got this 1990 Classic WWF pack for KLS about a year ago and today is Wrestlemania so it seemed a good day to finally open it. She’s got a large collection of wrestling cards but since Topps sets have become overpriced she no longer buys any new ones.

Every card in her pack was A-rank wrestling royalty, which is amazing considering the size of the set (>130 cards)! How are there no forgotten or C-rank guys here?

The answer was poor collation. In her 15 cards she actually got 1-14 (and 136), and since card sets like this usually put the ‘big guys’ at the front, she got all the biggest stars. This is objectively bad collation, but in this case it ended up giving her a dream pack 🙂

The photos and bios are good, and the cards sturdy and well cut. This is a high quality product, and I imagine was quite popular with wrestling fans 35 years ago. I’m curious about the other 120 cards, but considering the steep price of the individual packs these days (I paid $10) I’m sure we’ll never open another.

I’ve still got a few more packs stashed away aging in a closet, and three unopened boxes of 1980s era cards. Over the summer I’m sure I’ll finally open one of them 🙂